๐๐‘๐Œ – ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ž๐ฉ๐ž๐ง๐๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐Œ๐๐ฌ ๐Œ๐Ž๐”๐ฌ: ๐€ ๐’๐จ๐Ÿ๐ญ ๐“๐จ๐จ๐ฅ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ฅ ๐ƒ๐ข๐ฌ๐œ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ž

A subtle but politically weighty realignment is quietly taking shape in Ugandaโ€™s Parliament, following the decision by nine newly elected independent-leaning Members of Parliament to seek cooperation with the ruling  National Resistance Movement.

While the meeting was framed as an act of unity and collaboration, KMS Media Network understands that the development reflects a deeper political strategy: the early consolidation of parliamentary control ahead of the Speakerโ€™s 2026 electoral cycle.

โ€ขParliament has 67 independent MPs

โ€ข54 of them participated in NRM primaries.

This reality confirms that independents are not necessarily opposition, they are often politically adjacent actors who represent internal fractures within the ruling movement. As Counsel Enoch Barata, clarified that these MPs are not defecting but entering cooperation agreements through Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs). This is a critical distinction.

Rather than demanding formal party allegiance, NRM is deploying a softer mechanism: structured cooperation without official absorption.

In practice, such MOUs may translate into:

โ€ขSupport for NRM caucus resolutions

โ€ขVoting alignment on key legislation

โ€ขParticipation in government policy priorities

โ€ขReinforced parliamentary predictability

This is coalition-building within a dominant-party framework designed to expand control without triggering the political costs of open defections.

The attendance of the Speaker herself, Rt. Hon. Anita Annet Among  signals that this is not an ordinary party outreach effort but part of a broader parliamentary engineering process intended to stabilize numbers and discipline early. Although these MPs are newly elected, the conversation already points toward the next political horizon.

For independent MPs, cooperation is also practical. Operating outside the ruling party structure comes with institutional disadvantages:

โ€ขLimited caucus protection

โ€ขReduced leverage in committee assignments

โ€ขDifficulty accessing state-driven development programs

โ€ขIsolation in a Parliament dominated by NRM numbers

Cooperation becomes less about ideology and more about political survival and constituency delivery. In Ugandaโ€™s governance culture, MPs are often judged not by speeches but by tangible outcomes: roads, schools, health facilities, and government programs. Alignment with the ruling majority becomes a pathway to influence. The ruling partyโ€™s approach reflects strategic maturity.

NRM does not necessarily need these MPs to formally cross over.

By institutionalizing cooperation, the party gains:

โ€ขVotes without defections

โ€ขStability without internal primaries backlash

โ€ขControl without costly political battles

โ€ขBroader legitimacy in Parliament

This is dominance through integration, not confrontation.Ugandaโ€™s Parliament is not merely a legislative chamber, it is a battleground of alliances, numbers, and strategic positioning.

The MOU also allow independents to remain influential in a Parliament dominated by the ruling party, while strengthening NRMโ€™s working majority ahead of the new term.